![]() ![]() So, you would see the reverse of your observation in larger USB drives. It is important to note that if your USB were larger, NTFS tiers for cluster sizes increase more slowly than FAT32. These features improve reliability, security and flexibility but they also lead to slightly higher space constraints, which one sees when the cluster sizes are the same. NTFS provides things beyond FAT such as metadata on files (file name, creation date, access permissions and sometimes contents), security access control lists, and file system journaling. Why then would there be differences in formatting sizes? As already mentioned, there are more features built into NTFS than FAT32. This is a confusing point, and this makes this a good question. The cluster size, the smallest amount of disk space that can be used to hold a file, would be the same for NTFS as FAT32.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |